<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dyslexia Action, the Famous Five and a Duck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck</link>
	<description>ADHD, Dyslexia and Autism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brainduck</title>
		<link>http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck/comment-page-1#comment-57831</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck#comment-57831</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve replied on my blog in some detail, won&#039;t repost it all here, but whilst I do think the research should be published (give me more details &amp; I&#039;ll see what I can do) then I am not sure how it would &#039;settle&#039; anything, and it&#039;s far from the only study supporting the methodology used by DA.

I&#039;d also point out that I&#039;m the only one of the bloggers mentioned in &#039;Bad Science&#039; with links to DA, and I&#039;m not writing in an attempt to promote their treatment - indeed I&#039;ve tried to avoid mentioning it unless directly relevant, so  I&#039;m not trying to argue &#039;DA better than Dore&#039;.

Comment was deleted from the Guardian by the Guardian moderators who cover all of &#039;comment is free&#039;, it was nothing to do with me, BG, or any of the other &#039;bloggers&#039; - I&#039;d have rather it stood to be rebutted. I&#039;m more than happy for anyone else to publish it, I think it does me no harm &amp; makes Rutherford look rather silly. Unlike some I believe in argument by logic rather than lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve replied on my blog in some detail, won&#8217;t repost it all here, but whilst I do think the research should be published (give me more details &amp; I&#8217;ll see what I can do) then I am not sure how it would &#8217;settle&#8217; anything, and it&#8217;s far from the only study supporting the methodology used by DA.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also point out that I&#8217;m the only one of the bloggers mentioned in &#8216;Bad Science&#8217; with links to DA, and I&#8217;m not writing in an attempt to promote their treatment &#8211; indeed I&#8217;ve tried to avoid mentioning it unless directly relevant, so  I&#8217;m not trying to argue &#8216;DA better than Dore&#8217;.</p>
<p>Comment was deleted from the Guardian by the Guardian moderators who cover all of &#8216;comment is free&#8217;, it was nothing to do with me, BG, or any of the other &#8216;bloggers&#8217; &#8211; I&#8217;d have rather it stood to be rebutted. I&#8217;m more than happy for anyone else to publish it, I think it does me no harm &amp; makes Rutherford look rather silly. Unlike some I believe in argument by logic rather than lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck/comment-page-1#comment-57602</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myomancy.com/2008/06/dyslexia-action-the-famous-five-and-a-duck#comment-57602</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this the research paper that all the fuss is about, the one and only research paper (not peer-reviewed) on the Dyslexia Action site?
http://www.dyslexiaaction.org.uk/Administration/uploads/SPELLITSUMMARY.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this the research paper that all the fuss is about, the one and only research paper (not peer-reviewed) on the Dyslexia Action site?<br />
<a href="http://www.dyslexiaaction.org.uk/Administration/uploads/SPELLITSUMMARY.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.dyslexiaaction.org.uk/Administration/uploads/SPELLITSUMMARY.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
